I know I’m about three days behind, but TinyCatPants, a blog I read, had a post that made my head hurt. Her post was about overhearing teenagers and their apparent lack of knowledge. Or rather, their lack of knowledge about history.
First off, let me say that I kinda feel where those kids/teenagers/children/young adults or whatever you want to call them are coming from. I left high school with very little knowledge about literature. I remember studying Romeo and Juliet as a sophomore in high school, and that’s it. Anything else I’ve learned about literature either came from college courses or my own insatiable curiosity.
I’ll bet anyone ten bucks that if you walk up to an 18 or 19 year old and ask, “In literature, who is Tybalt and Mercutio?”, you would be met with blank stares.
For the record, Tybalt is Juliet’s cousin and Mercutio is friends and family with Romeo. Tybalt kills Mercutio in a sword fight. Granted, the relationship could be wrong, but I’m betting Scout or Holly will step in if I’m wrong.
My mother-in-law is a math professor at the local college. We’ve had many conversations about how freshmen come to college with horrible or non-existent mathematical skills.
History is no different.
I can remember listening to my fellow students in high school say “George Bush” when asked who was the first President of the United States. I can remember hearing students say that the Declaration of Independence freed the slaves, and I would cringe and think, “No, dumbass. Emancipation Proclamation.” I guess it’s a good thing that our teacher didn’t ask what the Monitor and the Merrimac was. (Psst..Monitor and Merrimac were ironside battleships that fought a major naval battle during the Civil War. Merrimac was for the South and had previously been sunk, and the Monitor was from the North.)
I’ve had friends in college who couldn’t tell me what the First Amendment was. COLLEGE!
We’re not educating our children in this country like we should be. As always, the biggest question is who to blame. The teachers? The students? The parents? I blame everyone. The parents should be teaching, the teachers should be teaching, and the students should actually be giving a shit. You can’t blame one person for the ignorance of America’s youth. We’re all dropping the ball on this.
I’ll even get political on your ass for a moment and say that No Child Left Behind is to blame also.
What you may not know about No Child Left Behind is that NCLB is not an original piece of legislation. NCLB has always been around. However, it was called the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965, and it was about how federal funds would be allocated to schools. ESEA has been reauthorized every 5 years since 1965, and was reauthorized under the current administration, but given a new name to make it sound new. The basis of NCLB is actually around 43 years old.
However, I blame NCLB, because teachers are given an extensive and detailed curriculum of what to teach students and when you should teach it. In high school history, my curriculum starts at the Reconstruction period after the Civil War and continues until now. The curriculum for history is around 20 or so pages.
NCLB forces teachers to not teach for the sake of learning, but to teach for the sake of testing. You see, if students fail the “Gateway” tests or whatever the tests are being called this week, the government has the right to pull funding. Even though no school has ever gotten their funding pulled that I know of, it’s still a possibility.
You see the logic? When students at a school perform poorly, you pull that school’s funding.
It’s okay. I’ll wait…..
First, why in the hell would you pull funding from a school that’s failing? Shouldn’t you be pumping more funding into that school? Second, teacher and administrators are so worried about getting a good grade on these tests or evaluations, that they teach to and from the test.
But here’s the best part. If a school does perform poorly, there’s no additional funding to give the school. They put these regulations into effect, but didn’t monetarily back it up.
Now, what happens when I start teaching Reconstruction period, and I’m met with 25 students who doesn’t know anything about the Civil War? If you solely teach by the curriculum, you do nothing. The Civil War is not on the test, therefore, you don’t teach it. There’s not enough time in a school year to cover everything your students were suppose to know when they walked into your classroom. Heck, it would take you a year to catch the students up to where they’re suppose to be.
Instead of looking for 99% scores on these tests, I think the education system would work better if we focused on growth and results instead. Did the students score 99%? No. Did the students raise their scores 20%? Yes? Then there are your results. No student or school is perfect, but if you show steady growth and increase in comprehension, then you are really getting good results.
Okay, okay. I’m stepping off the soapbox.
In the comment section of Tiny Cat Pants’ post, a person (the name momentarily slips me) talked about how they were appalled at the lack of knowledge about the HIV/AIDS epidemic. One person actually said in their comment that they heard a student refer to it as something that happens in Africa.
Like I said above, my history curriculum spans from Reconstruction to today. In my first education class, I did an entire lesson plan and activity on HIV/AIDS. I went from the beginning of Karposi’s Sarcoma to recent medical studies. It’s an issue in modern times that should be taught if I’m to follow the curriculum. Also, if I can teach my students how to stay safe and give them the knowledge I can, then I’m doing my little part to help fight the war against AIDS.
My Education Professor told me to find another topic, because HIV/AIDS was too controversial. This professor also said the same thing about a lesson I did about how horrible African Americans were treated during the Civil War and up to the Civil Rights era.
Too controversial? So, I can teach, but I can’t teach the stuff that’s controversial. The world doesn’t give a damn about the their teenage sensibilities. AIDS doesn’t give a damn whether you’re mature enough to handle it. How are we suppose to teach young adults when we have to teach with kid gloves on so we don’t upset them or offend them?
I wouldn’t fan the flames or get a room full of teenagers riled up about something. But I would teach them the facts, and if the facts upset them, then so be it. If the HIV virus offends you, then maybe you need to help do something about it.
The education system is screwed up. Now, we’re starting to see how screwed up it really is.
Posted in school | Tags: education, No Child Left Behind, Civil War, HIV, AIDS, grad school, curriculum, teaching







